The U.S. optimized for efficiency, innovation, and globalization. China optimized for control, scale, and industrial learning.
In recent years, many Western countries, particularly the United States, have advanced two seemingly contradictory narratives about China. On the one hand, the “China collapse theory” portrays state intervention and industrial policy as inherently inefficient, predicting stagnation or systemic failure and dismissing China’s development achievements. On the other hand, the “China threat theory” depicts China … Read more
Huawei’s decision not to manufacture cars represents a rational act of strategic restraint and deliberate ecosystem positioning. It reflects a clear-eyed assessment of the company’s core competencies, organizational structure, systemic risks, and sources of long-term value, rather than a retreat from the automotive domain. By avoiding full vehicle manufacturing while focusing on enabling technologies, Huawei … Read more
Collective bargaining is often presented as a primary mechanism for raising wages, yet this view overlooks a basic economic reality: wages are prices determined largely by workers’ marginal productivity and by labor market supply and demand. When unions act as monopolistic agents that restrict labor supply or resist technological change, they can introduce rigidity into … Read more
A persistent narrative in Western media attributes China’s manufacturing dominance to suppressed labor rights and artificially low wages, portraying its success as the product of a “sweatshop” model. Yet this explanation collapses under comparative scrutiny. India, where millions of young workers earn less than their Chinese counterparts, has failed to develop a comparable manufacturing base; … Read more
China’s strong and capable manufacturing ecosystem—particularly the toy manufacturing base, the counterfeit mobile phone industry, and the consumer electronics OEM system that emerged in Guangdong’s Pearl River Delta during the 2000s—provided a critical structural foundation for DJI’s rise. This ecosystem supplied far more than low-cost labor: it offered dense supplier networks, rapid prototyping capabilities, flexible … Read more
Some critics portray China’s full industrial chain as “anti-specialization,” a violation of comparative advantage, or even a contradiction of freedom and prosperity. Such views rest on a narrow understanding of specialization. In reality, a full industrial chain does not negate specialization; it represents its most advanced form, in which highly differentiated, interdependent, and efficient segments … Read more
Mainstream Chinese analyses and mainstream Western political-economy interpretations diverge systematically across core analytical dimensions. In causal diagnosis, Chinese discourse attributes Western stagnation to excessive financialization, speculative capital dominance, deindustrialization via offshoring, and market fundamentalism that hollowed out state capacity; Western accounts more often frame these outcomes as endogenous tensions of capitalism—profit squeeze, technological change, global … Read more
Amid intensifying U.S.–China strategic competition, a fundamental asymmetry lies in the United States’ inability—and institutional reluctance—to replicate China’s coordinated, top-down execution of industrial, technological, and strategic initiatives. China’s centralized governance model enables rapid alignment of policy, capital, and enterprise around national priorities, conferring advantages in speed, scale, and strategic coherence. By contrast, the U.S. system … Read more
U.S. manufacturing reshoring efforts are unlikely to succeed because they collide with the same shareholder-primacy system that originally drove offshoring. For decades, U.S. firms have been governed by incentives that prioritize short-term profits and stock prices over long-term productive capacity. Offshoring manufacturing to China and Mexico offered immediate financial gains through lower labor costs, lighter … Read more
Huawei has systematically studied the rise and fall of global telecommunications giants—Nortel, Lucent, Alcatel, Nokia Networks, Siemens Communications, and Ericsson—extracting deep lessons in organization, strategy, technology, and governance. These cases reflect not isolated failures but a broader pattern of systemic dysfunction in Western telecoms during the structural transformation of the industry from the late 20th … Read more