Divergent Chinese and Western Views on Power, Globalization

Mainstream Chinese analyses and mainstream Western political-economy interpretations diverge systematically across core analytical dimensions. In causal diagnosis, Chinese discourse attributes Western stagnation to excessive financialization, speculative capital dominance, deindustrialization via offshoring, and market fundamentalism that hollowed out state capacity; Western accounts more often frame these outcomes as endogenous tensions of capitalism—profit squeeze, technological change, global … Read more

Why U.S. Can’t Match China’s Top-Down Strategic Execution

Amid intensifying U.S.–China strategic competition, a fundamental asymmetry lies in the United States’ inability—and institutional reluctance—to replicate China’s coordinated, top-down execution of industrial, technological, and strategic initiatives. China’s centralized governance model enables rapid alignment of policy, capital, and enterprise around national priorities, conferring advantages in speed, scale, and strategic coherence. By contrast, the U.S. system … Read more

Shareholder Primacy Undermines U.S. Manufacturing Reshoring

U.S. manufacturing reshoring efforts are unlikely to succeed because they collide with the same shareholder-primacy system that originally drove offshoring. For decades, U.S. firms have been governed by incentives that prioritize short-term profits and stock prices over long-term productive capacity. Offshoring manufacturing to China and Mexico offered immediate financial gains through lower labor costs, lighter … Read more

Huawei’s Lessons from Telecom Decline in U.S.–China Rivalry

Huawei has systematically studied the rise and fall of global telecommunications giants—Nortel, Lucent, Alcatel, Nokia Networks, Siemens Communications, and Ericsson—extracting deep lessons in organization, strategy, technology, and governance. These cases reflect not isolated failures but a broader pattern of systemic dysfunction in Western telecoms during the structural transformation of the industry from the late 20th … Read more

America’s Unspoken Pivot to Strategic Industrial Planning

China’s repeated success with long-term industrial planning, exemplified by its Five-Year Plans, contrasts sharply with the United States’ difficulty in consciously adopting similar strategies. This divergence is not simply a matter of economics, but a reflection of differences in political structure, ideology, financial incentives, and historical experience. Yet the irony is that the U.S. already … Read more

Rebuilding U.S. Manufacturing: Lessons from American Amnesia

In American Amnesia: How the War on Government Led Us to Forget What Made America Prosper (2016), Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson challenge the claim that free markets alone produced American prosperity. They argue instead that the United States historically thrived through a mixed economy in which active public investment, effective governance, and private … Read more

Transplanting China’s 5G System into America’s Ideology Wall

This thought experiment transplants China’s 5G “national system engineering” playbook—characterized by centralized planning, coordinated industrial policy, and state-directed capital—into a U.S. institutional setting to test whether an equivalent nationwide 5G rebuild could occur. On technical grounds, the exercise assumes feasibility: spectrum can be allocated, infrastructure standardized, supply chains secured, and deployment accelerated at scale. The … Read more

From 1G to 5G: Strategic Rivalry Over Telecom Ecosystems

The evolution from 1G to 5G reflects a sustained three-way strategic contest among China, the United States, and Europe, in which technological standards serve as the fulcrum, industrial ecosystems as the primary arena, and national strategies as critical support. Rather than a linear process of technical upgrading, this trajectory unfolds through distinct phases—from dependence, to … Read more

China’s Distinct 4G/5G Path and Its Role in US-Tech Rivalry

China’s 4G/5G development has followed a distinctive three-pronged evolutionary path integrating institutions, technology, and markets. Shaped by strong state leadership, system-level integration, scenario-driven development, and ecosystem collaboration, this model contrasts sharply with the market- and capital-driven approaches of Europe and the United States, as well as the conglomerate-centered industrial trajectories of Japan and South Korea, … Read more

Why China’s Civilizational Resurgence Reframes U.S. Rivalry

China’s revival is plausible not because of inevitability, but because it rests on durable structural advantages: long civilizational continuity, a large and mobilizable population, a developmental state capable of intervention, and a unifying national narrative shaped by the “century of humiliation.” These features confer a degree of resilience that many historically declining powers lacked. Yet … Read more